API Access
Audit-ready evidence, as an API.
Alletho turns fragmented public information from courts, regulators, news, and registries into structured, entity-resolved evidence records, delivered through an API, monitoring, or ready-to-use dossiers.
The problem
Due diligence runs on evidence that is hard to get.
Companies with international supply chains are required to identify human-rights and environmental risks among their suppliers, and to document how they reached their conclusions. Under Germany's Lieferkettensorgfaltspflichtengesetz and the EU's evolving due-diligence rules, that analysis is expected to draw on external sources: media reports, indices, NGO studies, court and regulator records.
In practice that information is scattered across dozens of portals, often anonymized, unstructured, and not resolved to company identities. Compliance teams spend their time searching, interpreting, and documenting, and the most decisive evidence, what courts and regulators actually decided, is the hardest to find and use. Alletho exists to close that gap: a dedicated evidence layer a compliance team can put under a decision and an auditor can check.
What you get
Structured records from four source classes.
Alletho continuously collects relevant information, connects each finding to the correct legal entity through GLEIF-verified identifiers, and turns it into a structured evidence record. The sources:
- Court decisions, federated from European courts, from the CJEU and the German federal and state courts to further national systems, and resolved to the right company even where judgments are anonymized.
- Regulator enforcement actions from financial, data-protection, and competition authorities.
- Licensed multilingual news coverage, screened for relevance, entity match, and role, then classified along published severity dimensions.
- Structured registries: sanctions lists, debarment registers, exclusion decisions, and disclosure benchmarks.
Every record carries its provenance: the official source URL and its license, verifiable in one click. Three timestamps, including when we first ingested it, make the dataset point-in-time; its history cannot be rewritten. Classified records carry two confidence scores, the model's own and an independent deterministic one, with disagreements flagged and the high-severity tail human-reviewed. Everything stays record-level: we classify incidents, we do not sell company scores in B2B.
The court engine
Allejur.
Allejur is the engine that procures the court and regulator side of the evidence layer. It federates decisions from portals that do not interoperate, across ten European jurisdictions and multiple languages, and extracts each one deterministically, with no model involved: party role, outcome, whether the company won or lost, fine amounts, legal area from the cited statutes, and court instance. Rule-based extraction keeps this evidence class fully reproducible end to end.
The difference to what you may already buy is one of product shape, and you can verify it on any record. Adverse-media products deliver a severity signal from a proprietary model; our records deliver the underlying decision, extracted field by field, with the source one click away. Legal databases organize case law by legal question, for lawyers doing legal research; Allejur organizes it by company, for supplier-risk work: give it a supplier list, get back what courts and regulators have decided about those entities. Judge the claim on a sample of your own suppliers rather than on our word.
Where deterministic methods cannot reach, AI steps in, governed rather than trusted: classification against published rubrics, citations that structurally cannot point outside the ingested corpus, versioned arithmetic downstream. The pipeline resolves legal entities only, never natural persons, and the courts' own anonymization is preserved, never reversed.
Who it serves
Feeds, dossiers, and monitoring.
Supplier-risk and ESG platforms take the API feed and embed the evidence directly in their product. Consultancies and Mittelstand companies doing LkSG and CSDDD due diligence take citation-ready supplier dossiers and annual monitoring. Legal-AI and research platforms license the structured court and enforcement feed for retrieval inside their own stack.
Supply-chain due diligence is where we are starting, not where it ends. The same sourced conduct-evidence serves any institution embedding an ethics lens where a decision is made: ESG and research teams, banks and procurement screening, ethical fintechs.
Because the court and regulator core is public-record based, it can be licensed redistribution-friendly: your platform shows the evidence itself, not just a signal. And you license the inputs, not a fixed verdict, so you can apply your own weighting and the judgment stays yours to defend.
Why now
The rules increasingly ask for exactly this.
Germany's supply-chain regulator directs companies to base risk analysis on external sources and has announced audits of the methodology itself. The amended CSDDD makes desk scoping on reasonably available information the prescribed first step. And under the EU ESG Rating Regulation, company-level scores are a regulated activity while record-level evidence data is expressly exempt. Alletho sells evidence and dimensions, never a score, by design.
Early access
We are onboarding early partners now.
Tell us what you are building, which suppliers or portfolios you need covered, and what your auditors ask for, and we will follow up with samples and access. Commercial access runs under a separate written licence agreement, as the terms describe.
Request early access →Or reach us through the contact page.
